The care capacity goals of family carers and the role of technology in achieving them
| dc.contributor.author | Leslie, Myles | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gray, Robin P | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eales, Jacquie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fast, Janet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Magnaye, Andrew | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Akram | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-01T01:02:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-01T01:02:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-02-27 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2020-03-01T01:02:27Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background As global populations age, governments have come to rely heavily on family carers (FCs) to care for older adults and reduce the demands made of formal health and social care systems. Under increasing pressure, sustainability of FC’s unpaid care work has become a pressing issue. Using qualitative data, this paper explores FCs’ care-related work goals, and describes how those goals do, or do not, link to technology. Methods We employed a sequential mixed-method approach using focus groups followed by an online survey about FCs’ goals. We held 10 focus groups and recruited 25 FCs through a mix of convenience and snowball sampling strategies. Carer organizations helped us recruit 599 FCs from across Canada to complete an online survey. Participants’ responses to an open-ended question in the survey were included in our qualitative analysis. An inductive approach was employed using qualitative thematic content analysis methods to examine and interpret the resulting data. We used NVIVO 12 software for data analysis. Results We identified two care quality improvement goals of FCs providing care to older adults: enhancing and safeguarding their caregiving capacity. To enhance their capacity to care, FCs sought: 1) foreknowledge about their care recipients’ changing condition, and 2) improved navigation of existing support systems. To safeguard their own wellbeing, and so to preserve their capacity to care, FCs sought to develop coping strategies as well as opportunities for mentorship and socialization. Conclusions We conclude that a paradigm shift is needed to reframe caregiving from a current deficit frame focused on failures and limitations (burden of care) towards a more empowering frame (sustainability and resiliency). The fact that FCs are seeking strategies to enhance and safeguard their capacities to provide care means they are approaching their unpaid care work from the perspective of resilience. Their goals and technology suggestions imply a shift from understanding care as a source of ‘burden’ towards a more ‘resilient’ and ‘sustainable’ model of caregiving. Our case study findings show that technology can assist in fostering this resiliency but that it may well be limited to the role of an intermediary that connects FCs to information, supports and peers. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Geriatrics. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):52 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1455-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/111702 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45301 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | The care capacity goals of family carers and the role of technology in achieving them | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |