Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Danieleng
dc.contributor.authorNarine, Nadiraeng
dc.contributor.authorNaugler, Christopher T.eng
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-21T17:03:37Z
dc.date.available2012-08-21T17:03:37Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-13
dc.descriptionArticle deposited according to the BMJ Group policy for BMJ Open: http:// group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions/authorreprints, August 21, 2012.eng
dc.description.refereedYeseng
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding provided by the Open Access Authors Fund.eng
dc.identifier.citationFontaine D, Narine N, Naugler C. Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and metaanalysis. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen2012-000847eng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/33663
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/49184
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBMJeng
dc.publisher.corporateUniversity of Calgaryeng
dc.publisher.facultyMedicineeng
dc.publisher.urlhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/2/e000847.abstracteng
dc.rightsAttribution Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/*
dc.titleUnsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysiseng
dc.typejournal article
thesis.degree.disciplinePathologyeng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Naugler_BMJ_2012.pdf
Size:
256.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Cumming School of Medicine Research & Publications