Faculty Portfolio Development: Perception vs. Practices in a Major University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

atmire.migration.oldid5334
dc.contributor.advisorBeran, Tanya
dc.contributor.advisorBaig, Lubna
dc.contributor.authorAlyousif, Sarah
dc.contributor.committeememberOddone Paolucci, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.committeememberHecker, Kent
dc.contributor.committeememberMagzoub, Mohi Eldin
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T22:18:31Z
dc.date.available2017-01-31T22:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.description.abstractHigher educational institutions have been using faculty portfolios to help ensure that the mission of academia is being met. This study aimed to develop a faculty portfolio using a sequential mixed methods design. The portfolio development process took place in King Saud bin Abdulaziz University of Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) colleges based in Riyadh, Jeddah and Alhassa, Saudi Arabia. In-depth interviews and focus groups, two ubiquitous approaches for qualitative research, were used to collect data from purposefully selected interviewees (n = 18) and focus group participants (n = 24). The quantitative arm of this study included questionnaire administration to 66 participants. They completed a 59-item questionnaire developed to obtain evidence of the validity and reliability of items used to form a portfolio. The audio taped and videotaped data were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. The quantitative data were analysed using between group differences. This hybrid approach identified five main portfolio domains and their 59 subdomains. The individual domains, which were prioritized using judgemental weightings assigned by 18 participants, included education, service, research, professional development and academic management and leadership. Subdomains were identified within focus groups, with a total of 59 items representing measurable faculty daily activities that constitute the five main domains. The portfolio scores were found to have good reliability and validity based on the quantitative analyses and their triangulation with the qualitative results, thereby providing evidence of the trustworthiness and credibility of the data. This study informs the scientific community by presenting a faculty portfolio developed through a multi-step validation process. It is expected that this faculty portfolio will be implemented successfully in KSAU-HS colleges because its development is based on the opinions of all stakeholders affiliated with this higher educational institution.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlyousif, S. (2017). Faculty Portfolio Development: Perception vs. Practices in a Major University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26157en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/26157
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/3625
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subject.otherFaculty portfolio
dc.subject.otherin-depth interview
dc.subject.otherfocus group
dc.subject.othersequential mixed methods
dc.subject.othertriangulation
dc.subject.otherreliability and validity
dc.subject.otherthematic content analysis
dc.titleFaculty Portfolio Development: Perception vs. Practices in a Major University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineMedical Science
thesis.degree.disciplineMedical Education
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files