Theory and research in phonology: a question of alternatives

dc.contributor.author	Derwing, Bruce L
dc.date.accessioned	2016-06-17T20:16:16Z
dc.date.available	2016-06-17T20:16:16Z
dc.date.issued	1994-01
dc.description	Bruce L Derwing, University of Alberta
dc.description.abstract	I've asked to go first because I wanted to open this discussion with some very general remarks about the relation between theory and research . In fact, what I propose to share with you is what I consider to be the most important lesson I've learned about research. I learned it many years ago, and oddly enough I didn't learn it from a linguist, philosopher, or scholar of any official strip. Actually, I learned it from a guy named Sherlock Holmes.	en_US
dc.description.refereed	Yes	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Derwing, B. L. (1994). Theory and research in phonology: a question of alternatives. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 16(Winter), 11-16.	en_US
dc.identifier.doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/28911
dc.identifier.issn	2371-2643
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51372
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	University of Calgary	en_US
dc.publisher.department	Linguistics	en_US
dc.publisher.faculty	Arts	en_US
dc.publisher.institution	University of Calgary	en_US
dc.subject	Linguistics	en_US
dc.subject	Phonology	en_US
dc.subject	Science--Methodology	en_US
dc.subject	Logic	en_US
dc.subject	Objectivity	en_US
dc.title	Theory and research in phonology: a question of alternatives	en_US
dc.type	journal article