Identifying opportunities to support patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: qualitative interviews with clinicians

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNyhof, Bryanna B
dc.contributor.authorWright, Frances C
dc.contributor.authorLook Hong, Nicole J
dc.contributor.authorGroot, Gary
dc.contributor.authorHelyer, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorMeiers, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorQuan, May L
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Nancy N
dc.contributor.authorUrquhart, Robin
dc.contributor.authorWarburton, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorGagliardi, Anna R
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-03T00:06:16Z
dc.date.available2020-05-03T00:06:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-30
dc.date.updated2020-05-03T00:06:16Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) report poor patient-clinician communication, and long-lasting confusion and anxiety about their treatment and prognosis. Research shows that patient-centred care (PCC) improves patient experience and outcomes. Little is known about the clinician experience of delivering PCC for DCIS. This study characterized communication challenges faced by clinicians, and interventions they need to improve PCC for DCIS. Methods Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit Canadian clinicians by specialty, gender, years of experience, setting, and geographic location. Qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone. Data were analyzed using constant comparison. Findings were mapped to a cancer-specific, comprehensive PCC framework to identify opportunities for improvement. Results Clinicians described approaches they used to address the PCC domains of fostering a healing relationship, exchanging information, and addressing emotions, but do not appear to be addressing the domains of managing uncertainty, involving women in making decisions, or enabling self-management. However, many clinicians described challenges or variable practices for all PCC domains but fostering a healing relationship. Clinicians vary in describing DCIS as cancer based on personal beliefs. When exchanging information, most find it difficult to justify treatment while assuring women of a good prognosis, and feel frustrated when women remain confused despite their efforts to explain it. While they recognize confusion and anxiety among women, clinicians said that patient navigators, social workers, support groups and high-quality information specific to DCIS are lacking. Despite these challenges, clinicians said they did not need or want communication interventions. Conclusions Findings represent currently unmet opportunities by which to help clinicians enhance PCC for DCIS, and underscore the need for supplemental information and supportive care specific to DCIS. Future research is needed to develop and test communication interventions that improve PCC for DCIS. If effective and widely implemented, this may contribute to improved care experiences and outcomes for women diagnosed with and treated for DCIS.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 30;20(1):364
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06821-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/111937
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleIdentifying opportunities to support patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: qualitative interviews with clinicians
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12885_2020_Article_6821.pdf
Size:
561.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications