Deliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students

dc.contributor.authorStaal, Justine
dc.contributor.authorWaechter, Jason
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Jon
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chel H.
dc.contributor.authorZwaan, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-24T00:03:24Z
dc.date.available2023-09-24T00:03:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-21
dc.date.updated2023-09-24T00:03:23Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose Diagnostic errors are a large burden on patient safety and improving clinical reasoning (CR) education could contribute to reducing these errors. To this end, calls have been made to implement CR training as early as the first year of medical school. However, much is still unknown about pre-clerkship students’ reasoning processes. The current study aimed to observe how pre-clerkship students use clinical information during the diagnostic process. Methods In a prospective observational study, pre-clerkship medical students completed 10–11 self-directed online simulated CR diagnostic cases. CR skills assessed included: creation of the differential diagnosis (Ddx), diagnostic justification (DxJ), ordering investigations, and identifying the most probable diagnosis. Student performances were compared to expert-created scorecards and students received detailed individualized formative feedback for every case. Results 121 of 133 (91%) first- and second-year medical students consented to the research project. Students scored much lower for DxJ compared to scores obtained for creation of the Ddx, ordering tests, and identifying the correct diagnosis, (30–48% lower, p < 0.001). Specifically, students underutilized physical exam data (p < 0.001) and underutilized data that decreased the probability of incorrect diagnoses (p < 0.001). We observed that DxJ scores increased 40% after 10–11 practice cases (p < 0.001). Conclusions We implemented deliberate practice with formative feedback for CR starting in the first year of medical school. Students underperformed in DxJ, particularly with analyzing the physical exam data and pertinent negative data. We observed significant improvement in DxJ performance with increased practice.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Education. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):684
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04541-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/117235
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderBioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature
dc.titleDeliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12909_2023_Article_4541.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: