Candidacy 2.0 (CC) – an enhanced theory of access to healthcare for chronic conditions: lessons from a critical interpretive synthesis on access to rheumatoid arthritis care
| dc.contributor.author | Koehn, Sharon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jones, C A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barber, Claire | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jasper, Lisa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pham, Anh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lindeman, Cliff | |
| dc.contributor.author | Drummond, Neil | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-01T00:04:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-01T00:04:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-08-26 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2024-09-01T00:04:04Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background The Dixon-Woods et al. Candidacy Framework, a valuable tool since its 2006 introduction, has been widely utilized to analyze access to various services in diverse contexts, including healthcare. This social constructionist approach examines micro, meso, and macro influences on access, offering concrete explanations for access challenges rooted in socially patterned influences. This study employed the Candidacy Framework to explore the experiences of individuals living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their formal care providers. The investigation extended to assessing supports and innovations in RA diagnosis and management, particularly in primary care. Methods This systematic review is a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) of qualitative and mixed methods literature. The CIS aimed to generate theory from identified constructs across the reviewed literature. The study found alignment between the seven dimensions of the Candidacy Framework and key themes emerging from the data. Notably absent from the framework was an eighth dimension, identified as the “embodied relational self.” This dimension, central to the model, prompted the proposal of a revised framework specific to healthcare for chronic conditions. Results The CIS revealed that the eight dimensions, including the embodied relational self, provided a comprehensive understanding of the experiences and perspectives of individuals with RA and their care providers. The proposed Candidacy 2.0 (Chronic Condition (CC)) model demonstrated how integrating approaches like Intersectionality, concordance, and recursivity enhanced the framework when the embodied self was central. Conclusions The study concludes that while the original Candidacy Framework serves as a robust foundation, a revised version, Candidacy 2.0 (CC), is warranted for chronic conditions. The addition of the embodied relational self dimension enriches the model, accommodating the complexities of accessing healthcare for chronic conditions. Trial Registration This study did not involve a health care intervention on human participants, and as such, trial registration is not applicable. However, our review is registered with the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ASX5C . | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Services Research. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):986 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11438-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1880/119594 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Candidacy 2.0 (CC) – an enhanced theory of access to healthcare for chronic conditions: lessons from a critical interpretive synthesis on access to rheumatoid arthritis care | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |