The association between sedentary behaviour and indicators of stress: a systematic review
| dc.contributor.author | Teychenne, Megan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stephens, Lena D | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costigan, Sarah A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Olstad, Dana L | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stubbs, Brendon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Turner, Anne I | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-27T00:15:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-27T00:15:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-10-23 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-10-27T00:15:23Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Emerging evidence shows sedentary behaviour may be associated with mental health outcomes. Yet, the strength of the evidence linking sedentary behaviour and stress is still unclear. This study aimed to synthesise evidence regarding associations between time spent in sedentary behaviour and stress in adults. Methods A systematic search was conducted (January 1990 – September 2019). Following PRISMA guidelines, an evaluation of methodological quality, and best-evidence synthesis of associations between time in sedentary behaviour (including sitting time, TV viewing, computer use) and stress were presented. Twenty-six studies reporting on data from n = 72,795 people (age 18-98y, 62.7% women) were included. Results Across the studies (n = 2 strong-, n = 10 moderate- and n = 14 weak-quality), there was insufficient evidence that overall time spent in sedentary behaviour and sitting time were associated with stress, particularly when using self-report measures of sedentary behaviour or stress. There was strong evidence of no association between TV viewing, or computer use and stress. Amongst studies using objective measures of sedentary behaviour and/or stress there was also strong evidence of no association. Conclusion Although previous research suggested sedentary behaviour may be linked to mental health outcomes such as depression and anxiety, the evidence for an association between various types of sedentary behaviour and stress is limited in quality, and associations are either inconsistent or null. High-quality longitudinal/interventional research is required to confirm findings and determine the direction of associations between different contexts (i.e. purpose) and domains (i.e. leisure, occupational, transport) of sedentary behaviour and stress. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):1357 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7717-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/111171 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45570 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | The association between sedentary behaviour and indicators of stress: a systematic review | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |