Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, and Academic Integrity
dc.contributor.author | Eaton, Sarah Elaine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-10T20:08:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-10T20:08:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this presentation, Eaton highlights key points from her 2024 editorial for the International Journal for Educational Integrity, “Future-proofing integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology: prioritizing human rights, dignity, and equity”. Eaton argues for the prioritisation of human rights when developing and implementing misconduct policies. Existing approaches may be perpetuate inequities, particularly for individuals from marginalised groups. A human-rights-by-design approach, which centres human rights in policy development, revision, and implementation, ensuring that every individual is treated with dignity and respect. Recommendations for implementing a human-rights approach to misconduct investigations and case management are offered, covering areas such as procedural fairness, privacy, equity, and the right to education. Additional topics covered are the need to limit surveillance technologies, and the need to recognize that not all use of artificial intelligence tools automatically constitutes misconduct. In the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology, insisting on human rights and dignity when we investigate and address misconduct allegations is an ethical imperative that has never been more important. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1880/120184 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher.faculty | Werklund School of Education | en |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | en |
dc.rights | Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ | |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | |
dc.subject | academic integrity | |
dc.subject | misconduct | |
dc.subject | conduct | |
dc.subject | policy | |
dc.subject | procedure | |
dc.subject | neurotechnology | |
dc.subject | education | |
dc.subject | higher education | |
dc.subject | human rights | |
dc.subject | dignity | |
dc.subject | plagiarism | |
dc.subject | restorative justice | |
dc.title | Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, and Academic Integrity | |
dc.type | Presentation | |
ucalgary.scholar.level | Faculty |