“We’re sinking”: a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorParsons Leigh, Jeanna
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Stephana J.
dc.contributor.authorMizen, Sara J.
dc.contributor.authorSriskandarajah, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorFitzGerald, Emily A.
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Amity E.
dc.contributor.authorClement, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorFarkas, Brenlea
dc.contributor.authorDodds, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorColumbus, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorStelfox, Henry T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-28T00:04:32Z
dc.date.available2024-04-28T00:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-25
dc.date.updated2024-04-28T00:04:32Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Despite longstanding efforts and calls for reform, Canada’s incremental approach to healthcare changes has left the country lagging behind other OECD nations. Reform to the Canadian healthcare system is essential to develop a higher performing system. This study sought to gain a deeper understanding of the views of Canadian stakeholders on structural and process deficiencies and strategies to improve the Canadian healthcare system substantially and meaningfully. Methods We conducted individual, ~ 45-minute, semi-structured virtual interviews from May 2022 to August 2022. Using existing contacts and snowball sampling, we targeted one man and one woman from five regions in Canada across four stakeholder groups: (1) public citizens; (2) healthcare leaders; (3) academics; and (4) political decision makers. Interviews centered on participants’ perceptions of the state of the current healthcare system, including areas where major improvements are required, and strategies to achieve suggested enhancements; Donabedian’s Model (i.e., structure, process, outcomes) was the guiding conceptual framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified, and inductive thematic analysis was performed independently and in duplicate according to published methods. Results The data from 31 interviews with 13 (41.9%) public citizens, 10 (32.3%) healthcare leaders, 4 (12.9%) academics, and 4 (12.9%) political decision makers resulted in three themes related to the structure of the healthcare system (1. system reactivity; 2. linkage with the Canadian identity; and 3. political and funding structures), three themes related to healthcare processes (1. staffing shortages; 2. inefficient care; and 3. inconsistent care), and three strategies to improve short- and long-term population health outcomes (1. delineating roles and revising incentives; 2. enhanced health literacy; 3. interdisciplinary and patient-centred care). Conclusion Canadians in our sample identified important structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system. Meaningful reforms are needed and will require addressing the link between the Canadian identity and our healthcare system to facilitate effective development and implementation of strategies to improve population health outcomes.
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Public Health. 2024 Apr 25;82(1):56
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01279-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/118572
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/43414
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.title“We’re sinking”: a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13690_2024_Article_1279.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications