A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHoekstra, Femke
dc.contributor.authorMrklas, Kelly J
dc.contributor.authorSibley, Kathryn M
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Tram
dc.contributor.authorVis-Dunbar, Mathew
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Christine J
dc.contributor.authorCrockett, Leah K.
dc.contributor.authorGainforth, Heather L
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Ian D
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-02T01:02:18Z
dc.date.available2018-12-02T01:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-30
dc.date.updated2018-12-02T01:02:17Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Research partnership approaches, in which researchers and stakeholders work together collaboratively on a research project, are an important component of research, knowledge translation, and implementation. Despite their growing use, a comprehensive understanding of the principles, strategies, outcomes, and impacts of different types of research partnerships is lacking. Generating high-quality evidence in this area is challenging due to the breadth and diversity of relevant literature. We established a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach to identify and synthesize the partnership literature and better understand the evidence base. This review protocol outlines an innovative approach to locating, reviewing, and synthesizing the literature on research partnerships. Methods Five reviews pertaining to research partnerships are proposed. The Coordinated Multicenter Team developed a consensus-driven conceptual framework to guide the reviews. First, a review of reviews will comparatively describe and synthesize key domains (principles, strategies, outcomes, and impacts) for different research partnership approaches, within and beyond health (e.g., integrated knowledge translation, participatory action research). After identifying commonly used search terminology, three complementary scoping reviews will describe and synthesize these domains in the health research partnership literature. Finally, an umbrella review will amalgamate and reflect on the collective findings and identify research gaps and future directions. We will develop a collaborative review methodology, comprising search strategy efficiencies, terminology standardization, and the division of screening, extraction, and synthesis to optimize feasibility and literature capture. A series of synthesis and scoping manuscripts will emerge from this Coordinated Multicenter Team approach. Discussion Comprehensively describing and differentiating research partnership terminology and its domains will address well-documented gaps in the literature. These efforts will contribute to and improve the quality, conduct, and reporting of research partnership literature. The collaborative review methodology will help identify and establish common terms, leverage efficiencies (e.g., expertise, experience, search and protocol design, resources) and optimize research feasibility and quality. Our approach allows for enhanced scope and inclusivity of all research user groups and domains, thereby contributing uniquely to the literature. This multicenter, efficiency and quality-focused approach may serve to inspire researchers across the globe in addressing similar domain challenges, as exist in this rapidly expanding field.
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2018 Nov 30;7(1):217
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/109206
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45991
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleA review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13643_2018_Article_879.pdf
Size:
974.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications